Format vs quick format windows xp

If you just do a quick format, then the file data is still on the disk, only the file system structure file names and information where the files are stored on the disk are deleted. You might not be sure if the hard disk is in a good state. Then a full format is a good idea because it accesses every sector, so if any sector is bad, this will be recognized.

With a quick format only a few sectors will be written to. With bad luck you end up with a successful quick format, and when you want to write data to the disk later, it fails. Then you will probably be wishing you had done a full format that would have checked the entire disk right at the beginning. You asked about risks and consistency.

I wrote about the risks above. Regarding consistency there is no difference. With every format the operating system writes the file system structure, and this structure is the starting point for every file system access. It does not make any difference if unused sectors are zeroed out or filled with random data. For more information, you might want to take a look at the Wikipedia Article for Formatting. Have something to add to the explanation? Sound off in the comments.

Want to read more answers from other tech-savvy Stack Exchange users? Check out the full discussion thread here. Use Google Fonts in Word. Use FaceTime on Android Signal vs. Customize the Taskbar in Windows What Is svchost. Best Smartwatches. Best Gaming Laptops. Best Smart Displays. Best Home Security Systems. Best External Solid State Drives. Best Portable Chargers. Best Phone Chargers.

Best Wi-Fi Range Extenders. Best Oculus Quest 2 Accessories. Best iPad Air Cases. This is the high-level formatting which is further divided into two categories: quick format and full format. Here it becomes clear that the quick format and full format both are mainly related to the partitions in the disks. Also, here are the best fixes for the issues like WmiPrvSE. You can follow the steps given below in order to be able to perform the formatting process in Disk Management:.

You can uncheck it if you want to run a full format for the partition. What are the actual differences between the quick format and full format? Will the Quick Format erase the data completely or partially? All of the questions need to be answered very well, and I have done the same.

Below I have described all of the differences you need to know between these two kinds of formatting:. When it comes to the speed of formatting the partition, quick format is always faster than the full format. And, on the other hand, the full format completely erases all of the data stored on the partition of the disk.

Unless you have overwritten it, the data deleted with a quick format on the partition can be recovered with the use of data recovery software. But, on the other hand, normally, you cannot recover the data erased with the full formatting process.

In Windows XP and the earlier versions, you could also recover the data of the disk partition that had been formatted with a full format. But, later, in Windows Vista and the succeeding versions, the data formatted with the full format cannot be normally recovered with any data recovery software.

And this formatting is operated on partitions. However, the high-level formatting is specifically divided into two modes in the actual operations: quick format and full format it is also called general format. The differences between quick format vs. A good knowledge about them will help computer users make best use of disk. First, let's take formatting in Windows Explorer and Disk Management as examples. When computer users format a partition, quick format is checked by default.

If they uncheck quick format, full format mode is selected automatically. Then click Format. Then, right click a partition and select Format. Then, type "diskpart" to open diskpart window.

What is the difference between quick format and full format? Many people are concerned about these questions. To figure out these problems, computer users must know what happens when they format partition with quick format vs.

Quick format will "delete" files from the partition and rebuild the file system , volume label, and cluster size. It is faster than full format. However, it's not the real sense of formatting. Pay attention that I used the word "delete", not "erase".

That means that quick format doesn't really erase all the data. It just marks the partition as "formatted" and destroys the journal that keeps tracks of the files and their locations on hard drive. So, the data is still on the hard drive and it can be easily recovered by a data recovery software before it is overwritten. Full format will clear files completely from the partition, rebuild the file system, volume label, and cluster size, and scan partition for logical bad sectors that's why full format is slower than quick format.

It is the real sense of formatting and that's why some people are afraid of it. In Windows with the versions Windows XP and earlier, full format just had the additional bad sector scanning function compared to quick format. That means that data can be easily recovered in these Windows operating system even if full format is performed. But full format is changed in Windows Vista and later Windows versions, it will erase original data, write zeros to the whole partition, and finally erase zeroes again to avoid the possibility of data recovery.

So, full format does erase all data. Generally speaking, data that is fully formatted in Windows Vista and later Windows versions will not be able to be recovered by data recovery software.

However, some people still think that data can be recovered with more advanced technology through the residual magnetism on disk. Then, how to make data unrecoverable to guarantee users' data recovery? Many people may wonder about that. If a computer user has fully formatted a disk, it's difficult for him to recover data with civilian data recovery software.