Algorithm problems and solutions pdf

A short summary of this paper. Zoraghi, A. Shahsavar, S. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Shahsavar Email m. Niaki Email Niaki sharif. Seyed Taghi. The study aims at finding an optimal Pareto frontier for a triple objective model derived for the problem. While the first objective minimizes the makespan of the project, the second objective maximizes the robustness of the project schedule and finally the third objective minimizes the total costs pertaining to renewable and nonrenewable resources involved in a project.

The parameters of algorithms are tuned by the response surface methodology. The algorithms are carried out on a set of benchmarks and are compared based on five performance metrics evaluating their efficiencies in terms of closeness to the optimal frontier, diversity, and variance of results.

Finally, a statistical assessment is conducted to analyze the results obtained by the algorithms. It is algorithms and decrease accuracy. The first envisages a third-party intervention, disadvantaged in society because of their origin, income whereby an entity external to the provider of algorithms level, or sexual orientation.

The two approaches are not mutually to challenges for autonomy exclusive, they may bring different benefits depending on and informational privacy contexts of application, and their combination may also be beneficial. The collective impact of algorithms has spurred discussions Given the significant impact that algorithmic decisions on the autonomy afforded to end users. Algorithm-based services algorithmic fairness Lee et al.

This framework aims to maintain a well-functioning 2. Rahwan , 1. It accomplishes this by identifying and negotiating the values of different stakeholders affected by In considering the ethical challenges of AI, Yang et al. This information ible. This includes information ranging from characteristics appropriate decisions. As such, a key issue identified in Chakraborty et al. This is further complicated by a lack of transpar- algorithmic profiling and predictions Milano et al.

Ananny and Crawford secured without securing group privacy. Participatory design aims at translates in a loss of autonomy. Wider sociotechni- will vary with the context, improving the algorithmic design cal structures make it difficult to trace back responsibility for by including feedback from the various stakeholders of the actions performed by distributed, hybrid systems of human algorithm falls in line with the aforementioned scholarship and artificial agents Floridi ; Crain Rea- tional privacy and information-processing benefits Sloan sons for this include trade secret protection; complex mar- and Warner , This is practiced by organisations as Regulation has played an important role in instituting the well as by individuals.

Rubel et al. When ProPublica revealed the anti-Semitic can ensure provable privacy protection on sensitive data, categories and other news outlets reported similarly such as genomic data Wang et al. Persily The technical limitations of various ML algorithms, such as This can lead field experts, such as clinicians, to to tracing moral responsibility and accountability for the avoid questioning the suggestion of an algorithm even when actions performed by ML algorithms.

Regarding moral it may seem odd to them. The interplay between field experts responsibility, Reddy et al. Even for non-learning algorithms, traditional, linear uted systems Floridi DeepMind Health established an Inde- that human decision-making would receive. This approach pendent Review Panel with unfettered access to the company has been echoed by many others in the reviewed literature until Google halted it in Murgia However, Ananny and Crawford ; Blacklaws ; Buhmann expecting a single oversight body, like a research ethics com- et al.

Indeed, some have frameworks to trace and ascribe moral responsibility. In other words, who tally ethical than one is. While logic. Notably, this approach decouples moral responsibility ML algorithms do require a level of technical intervention from the intentionality of the actors and from the very idea to improve their explainability, most approaches focus on of punishment and reward for performing a given action, to normative interventions Fink For example, Ananny focus instead on the need to rectify mistakes back-propa- and Crawford argue that, at least, providers of algorithms gation and improve the ethical working of all the agents in ought to facilitate public discourse about their technology the network.

Ananny and Crawford Similarly, to address the issue of ad hoc ethical actions, some have claimed that account- ability should first and foremost be addressed as a matter of convention Dignum et al.

Although that article is now inevitably outdated in ity for their algorithms regardless of how opaque they are terms of specific references and detailed information about Malhotra et al.

While it is true, at least in were made. Vienna Austria: ACM. Accessed 24 Floridi b; Morley et al. Accessed 24 Aug Aggarwal N The norms of algorithmic credit scoring. Oxford Uni- versity Press, Oxford. New Media Soc 20 3 — Accessed 24 Aug ics and algorithms.

Accessed from November to March Neuroethics 13 3 — Big Data Soc 4 2 cal details, examples and tools. These were sourced from Beer D The social power of algorithms. Inform Commun Soc 20 1 :1— Sociol we can trust. Digit Journal 5 7 — J explanationn is probably not the remedy you are looking for.

Am Stat Assoc 67 — Accessed 24 August Commun Soc 15 5 — J Bus Ethics. Accessed Floridi L Distributed morality in an information society. Sci 24 Aug Eng Ethics 19 3 — Big Data Soc Floridi L Faultless responsibility: on the nature and allocation 3 1 Philos Technol 30 4 — Philos Technol 32 2 — Philos Technol 32 1 :1— Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other in society. Harvard Data Sci Rev.

Nat Mach mendations. Mind Mach 28 4 — New Media Soc 20 1 — The effects of machine learning on credit Conference.

Chicago, Illinois: American Institute of Aeronautics markets. Philos Technol 31 4 — Accessed ence on Artificial Intelligence, — Univ Chicago zation. Proc Priv Enhanc Technol 1 — Health Inform Lib J 26 2 — In: Proceedings available for academic research through social science one.

In: Proceedings of the Confer- — Accessed 24 Aug J Med Ethics 46 3 — Accessed 24 Aug ArXiv Harwell D Dating apps need women. ACM Comput Surv 49 2 :1— An empirical Hauer T Society caught in a labyrinth of algorithms: disputes, study of apparent gender-based discrimination in the display promises, and limitations of the new order of things.

Society of STEM career ads. Manag Sci 65 7 — AI, Ethics, and Society, — Valencia, Spain: Association for Computational Linguistics.

Philos Technol 29 1 — Big Data Soc 5 1 J Inform Commun Ethics Soc 16 3 — Fordham Law Review. Accessed 24 Aug to algorithmic services: considerations for fair and motivating Hutson M Bringing machine learning to the masses.

Sci- smart community service management that allocates donations ence — In: Proceedings of the CHI ce. Accessed transparent, and accountable algorithmic decision-making pro- 24 Aug cesses: the premise, the proposed solutions, and the open chal- James G, Witten G, Hastie T, Tibshirani R An Introduction to lenges. Medium: Berkman Klein Center Collection. Accessed 10 Oct for generative adversarial networks. Accessed 24 Aug epistemology in big data research. Consid- algorithmic equity: lessons from the field.

In: Proceedings of the ering algorithmic ethical subjectivation. Barcelona Spain: ACM. J Bus Ethics 4 — Yale Law Journal, no. Comput Appl. AI Soc. Big Data Soc. Ethics Inf Technol 20 1 :5— Inform ArXiv Accessed Commun Soc 21 7 — Big Data Soc initial review of publicly available ai ethics tools, methods and 6 1 Sci Eng Ethics.

AI Now Institute. Accessed 24 Aug ssrn. Financial Times, New York, p policing systems, and justice. Accessed 24 Aug force racism. Mind Mach 29 4 — Science — Ethical Theory Moral Pract 22 4 — Examining pub- Sci Paraschakis D Towards an ethical recommendation framework. In: Paraschakis D Algorithmic and ethical aspects of recommender Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and systems in E-commerce.

Sci Rep 9 1 Shah H Algorithmic accountability. Comput Hum Behav 98 Septem- bmj. Soc Stud Sci 48 1 — Weller A Transparency: motivations and challenges. Accessed 18 July ing models. Accessed 24 Aug cyber arms race.